Compare 11 popular icon libraries side by side. See icon counts, styles, licenses, and features to pick the best library for your project.
| Library | Icons | Style | License | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Font Awesome | ~2,000 | Solid, Regular, Brands | CC BY 4.0 / MIT | General web projects, brand logos |
| Material Design | ~2,500 | Filled, Outlined, Rounded, Sharp, Two-tone | Apache 2.0 | Android apps, Material UI projects |
| Heroicons | ~450 | Outline, Solid, Mini | MIT | Tailwind CSS projects, clean UI |
| Lucide | ~1,500 | Outline (consistent stroke) | ISC | Modern web apps, Feather replacement |
| Feather Icons | ~287 | Outline (24x24 grid) | MIT | Minimal designs, small projects |
| Bootstrap Icons | ~2,000 | Filled, Outlined | MIT | Bootstrap projects, enterprise apps |
| Remix Icon | ~2,800 | Line, Fill | Apache 2.0 | Chinese tech ecosystem, versatile |
| Tabler Icons | ~5,000 | Outline (consistent 2px stroke) | MIT | Dashboards, admin panels, large variety |
| Phosphor Icons | ~7,500 | 6 weights (Thin to Fill) | MIT | Flexible weight system, large collection |
| Simple Icons | ~3,000 | Brand logos | CC0 1.0 | Brand/company logos, tech stacks |
| Ionicons | ~1,300 | Outline, Filled, Sharp | MIT | Ionic/mobile apps, cross-platform |
Font Awesome is the most widely used icon library on the web, with strong brand recognition and a large ecosystem. Material Design Icons are Google's official icon set, designed for consistency with Material Design guidelines.
| Font Awesome | Material Design | |
|---|---|---|
| Icon count | ~2,000 (free) | ~2,500 |
| Styles | Solid, Regular, Brands | Filled, Outlined, Rounded, Sharp, Two-tone |
| Grid size | Variable | 24x24 |
| License | CC BY 4.0 / MIT | Apache 2.0 |
| Brand icons | Yes (450+) | No |
| Framework support | React, Vue, Angular, SVG | React, Vue, Angular, Web Components |
| Best for | General web, brand logos | Android/Material UI apps |
Verdict: Choose Font Awesome if you need brand logos and wide community support. Choose Material Design for Google-style apps or Android development.
These three libraries share a similar aesthetic: clean, outline-style icons with consistent stroke widths. Lucide is a fork of Feather with 5x more icons. Heroicons is built by the Tailwind CSS team.
| Lucide | Heroicons | Feather | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Icon count | ~1,500 | ~450 | ~287 |
| Maintained | Active (community) | Active (Tailwind Labs) | Slow updates |
| Grid size | 24x24 | 24x24, 20x20 | 24x24 |
| Styles | Outline only | Outline + Solid + Mini | Outline only |
| Tree-shakeable | Yes | Yes | Partial |
| License | ISC | MIT | MIT |
Verdict: Lucide is the best Feather replacement with the largest collection. Heroicons is ideal if you use Tailwind CSS. Feather is legacy — migrate to Lucide for new projects.
Both offer massive collections of high-quality icons. Tabler focuses on consistent 2px strokes. Phosphor offers 6 weight variants per icon (Thin, Light, Regular, Bold, Fill, Duotone).
| Tabler Icons | Phosphor Icons | |
|---|---|---|
| Icon count | ~5,000 | ~7,500 (1,250 unique x 6 weights) |
| Weights | 1 (2px stroke) | 6 (Thin, Light, Regular, Bold, Fill, Duotone) |
| Grid size | 24x24 | 256x256 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Framework packages | React, Vue, Svelte, Angular | React, Vue, Svelte, Elm, Flutter |
| Best for | Dashboards, admin panels | Flexible designs needing multiple weights |
Verdict: Choose Phosphor if you need weight flexibility (thin to bold to fill). Choose Tabler for the most variety with a consistent look.